Recall

Bowie Citizens for Accountable Government Endorse Dufour WOOLFLEY

Bowie Citizens for Accountable Government is pleased to announce that we endorse Dufour Woolfley for District 2 in Bowie, Maryland.

 

Dufour’s public record of fighting for responsible growth and limited development, with total accountability to your constituency warrants your vote
— Bowie Citizens for Accountable Government

After meeting with all of the candidates, and careful consideration, we have decided that Mr. Woolfley has the knowledge of the issues, and will be an independent voice, representing the concerns of his constituents – not developers.

As citizens of Bowie, Maryland, our members know that this election has great implications for the future of Bowie. Since our founding, our mission has been to ensure that our elected officials answer to their constituents, listen to our concerns, and involve us in the decision-making process. Dufour Woolfley has the knowledge, leadership, and the track record to serve as Bowie City Councilmember, District 2. 

Woolfley’s public record of fighting for responsible growth and limited development, with total accountability to citizens of Bowie, warrants your vote. We look forward to working towards his victory, and shaping the future of Bowie together.

We thank the citizens of Bowie for their support thus far. It is important that everyone who signed the recall petition gets behind one candidate, so that the vote is not split. This election is of the utmost importance to the future of our beloved Bowie.

We respectfully ask that you continue to help Save Our City and support Dufour Woolfley on MONDAY, March 12, 2018.

Barbara Ballagh - Other Voices Bowie Blade News

From "Other Voices" Bowie Blade News - Thursday, April 13th 2017

To understand what is happening around Bowie, you need to attend the City Council meetings and see how the elected members run the city and do or do not represent us

I had not attended a council meeting in years, until I attended the January meeting for the Market Place Apartments. I was appalled with what I saw and heard.

Not only did the council not listen to the citizen’s and their petition, but they also ignored their traffic study. They completely ignored their own advisory board’s position against the Market Place Apartments. I had to ask “What is going on?”

After that, I attended more meetings to figure out what was happening. It didn’t take long to see that council business is no longer carried out as I remembered.  A lot of their decisions are made prior to the meetings. There are no discussions, the Council members seldom give reasons for their votes, and simple unsupported claims of “good for Bowie” are often stated.

What is going on in Bowie is not limited to the Market Place. This is just one example of the poor representation the Council is providing for the Citizens of Bowie who, elected them as their representatives.

Unconstrained development with unsupportable roads and infrastructure, excessive spending with threats of tax increases, lack of conserving resources (or tax reductions) during times of budget surplus, building a new gym and ice rink, soon-to-come traffic chokers and traffic circle on Belair Drive are other examples where the Council is not listening or soliciting input from the Citizens.

The mayor and the council appear to have become complacent, more so now that their term has been increased to four years. We need to make sure our council remains accountable to us, the people.

The entire council takes an oath to support the Constitution, to which the Bowie City government is an extension. “We the People” in our Constitution are not independent individuals with self-interests or business (to which the Council gives significant attention). The representatives on the City Council should comply with their sworn oath, and represent the citizens of Bowie above their own self-interest.

 

Since the Council is not doing their job and have failed to uphold their oath, I support the Bowie Recall. This recall is our opportunity to make the Council members accountable to us as they have committed to.

Barbara Ballagh

Bowie

Citizens' group seeks signatures to recall Bowie mayor, two council members

by John McNamara - Bowie Blade News 

About 50 Bowie residents are unhappy with the decisions of the city's government, and they're planing to do something about it.

A group calling itself "Bowie Citizens for Accountable Government" has been meeting for several weeks to plot strategy. The group wants to collect enough signatures to force a recall election targeting City Council members Diane Polangin (District 2), Jimmy Marcos (at-large) and Mayor G. Frederick Robinson.

Members of the group expects to begin knocking on doors later this month to collect signatures. They also plan to launch a website in the next few weeks.

"The group was not just formed for this recall initiative," said Larry Swank, one of the members of the group. "There's going to be a long-term monitoring of what's going on and we'll have a home base for people to come who have concerns. This is just one activity that this group is going to initiate."

According to the city charter, voters may file a petition with the city clerk for the recall of any council member or mayor with six months or more remaining in his or her term.

The last citywide election was in 2015. For the first time, the mayor and council members were elected to four-year terms, meaning that the next citywide election wouldn't be until 2019.

 

Bowie council approves Marketplace apartments

A special recall election will be held if 25 percent of the registered voters within the district of the affected council member or within the city for at-large council members (like Marcos) or the mayor have signed a petition within 30 days of its filing.

According to the charter, the special election will take place within 30 days of the certification of the signatures.

"I've been hearing they were going to do this," Robinson said. "I understand people being upset ... Obviously, it stems from the people who disagreed with us on the Marketplace (apartments). I'm confident we made the right decision."

County board OK's preliminary plan for Marketplace apartments

Robinson contends that the city couldn't afford to let the old Marketplace shopping center deteriorate any further because it would have hurt the rest of the Route 450 retail corridor that forms the heart of Bowie. Getting Berman Enterprises, a Rockville-based developer, to revitalize the shopping center also meant allowing apartments on the property — which the zoning of the site allows.

Residents contended that the complex is too large — even scaled down from the initial plan for 300 units to the current 225.

"I can understand they're very upset," Marcos said. "I truly believe we did what was in the best interests of the city. I've done everything I can to help our community — I was born and raised here. I don't feel I've ever done anything to hurt it."

Polangin declined to comment. "They're going to do what they're going to do," she said.

In a 4-3 vote earlier this year, the council approved a 225-unit apartment complex to accompany the new Marketplace shopping center that opened last fall. The vote angered many residents, who cited concerns over traffic, potential crime and the adverse affect an apartment complex's presence could have on the value of nearby homes.

Robinson, Marcos and Polangin all voted in favor of the apartments. So did council member Courtney Glass. The shopping center and the future apartments are in District 2, Polangin's district.

Swank, meanwhile, owns a house on Scarlett Lane and the new complex will sit just beyond his backyard fence.

"That (apartment vote) started a lot of this," Swank said. "There's a swell. A lot of people that have joined this (group) are concerned about other development. We just think they are a little off-base and not responsive to citizens' concerns and that's why this initiative has taken place."

Residents have also been vocal in their objection to the Melford development near Routes 50 & 301, which will add 1,700 more housing units (apartments and townhomes) to the city's residential inventory. Plans for a 400-home development near Sacred Heart Catholic Church on Route 450 also drew heated opposition at public hearings.

Swank says the citizens group has a core of about 50 members and plans to recruit more volunteers in the days ahead. To initiate a recall election for Polangin in District 2, the group will need to collect about 2,700 signatures on their petition – one-fourth of the registered voters in the district.

A petition opposing the Marketplace apartments that residents turned into the city included 900 signatures – about one-third of the total needed to set the wheels in motion for a recall election.

Reaching that benchmark for Robinson and Marcos will be more difficult, Swank acknowledged. Since they both hold citywide offices, the citizens group would need to collect about 11,000 signatures, or one-third of the city's 43,000 registered voters.

He said that the group will find out early on if there's enough support to bring about a recall election involving Robinson and Marcos.

"Getting 12,000 (signatures) is a lot bigger number than the few thousand we need for the district," he said. "We'll see how it goes. We're going to go with what we've got and learn from what we do."

Recall Now - Larry Swank

Recall Now

Please help us put the brakes on our fast changing community Many members of the Bowie City Council have been more interested in growth and tax revenue than maintaining and improving the quality of life in our unique Bowie communities. Now that council members serve for 4-years instead of 2-years they are operating in a way to support growth at any cost, putting local businesses and developer ambitions before resident’s needs.

One example of this is the resent Council decision to allow the construction of 225 apartments on the small open space behind the new Marketplace Shopping Center. On 3 January 24, 2017 the City Council voted against the findings of the Bowie Planning Department, the recommendations of the Bowie Advisory Planning Board, and over 900 resident objections. That decision shocked the bowie citizens in attendance.

Bowie citizens are empowered to recall members of the City Council, including the Mayor, who are not representing the best interest of Bowie. This action is not to punish the Council members who voted for the oversized Marketplace Apartment development. We are asking for your support to stop some members of the Council from doing the same at the Hilltop Plaza Shopping Center, Freestate (Giant) Shopping Center, Whitehall … see development plan to add more

The Marketplace Apartment development is a good example of how not to do growth in Bowie. The Council pushed the developer to clean up the mess at the Marketplace site. The City gave them land, zoning deviations, and a stack of money to build on the site. The City did not communicate with the impacted neighbors for the first three years of the project. They worked with the County to avoid formal zoning changes and fast tracked an alternative to add Apartments to the site, without citizen input. Over the last few years citizens have had little backing from most Council members to stop or rightsize the Marketplace apartment project.

We only have one or two chances in a century to impact real change on a site like the Marketplace. To date we have lost out on the appealing Bowie Main Street vision of an upscale destination with “unique character and sense of place.”

The 2006 Bowie and Vicinity Master Plan envisions a mixed-use activity center which includes the Marketplace. The plan paints an attractive picture with active commercial and residential components. It also sets forth a policy that “…development of Bowie Main Street not adversely impact the character of the existing residential neighborhood.” A key strategy of the plan is to “…transition in building density and intensity from more intense uses located at the core of Bowie Main Street along MD 450 to less intense uses along the edge, adjacent to residential neighborhoods. Well they had 10 years to get it right, they got it wrong, and the developer plans to make it worse.

The Bowie Planning Department recommend disapproval of the plan for the proposed residential component of the Marketplace and came up with correct decisions involving:

1) excessive density for both the available space on-site and the proximity to the adjacent residential neighborhood (recommending only 100 units);

2) excessive vehicle traffic on city streets that do not meet current City and County maximum service volume; and,

3) excessive scale, mass and bulk of the proposed building being incompatible with both the existing detached residential homes and the new Market Place retail buildings, which will adversely impact the character of existing neighborhoods

Some City Council members felt an obligation to the developer that went so deep that they rejected;

 922 citizen signatures on a petition to stop the additional traffic gridlock from a large apartment complex;

 professional City staff recommendations for less density, lower traffic, and compatibility with the character of existing neighborhoods

 The unanimous project disapproval of the good Bowie citizens who make up the Bowie Advisory Planning Board.

We ask your help in removing selected Bowie City Council members under the provisions of Bowie City Charter, Sec. 32A.

Recall: 1. Mayor Frederick G. Robinson

2. At-Large Councilmember James Marcos

3. District 2 Councilmember Diane Polangin

4. District 3 Councilmember Courtney Glass